| About Sandra Frankel | Sandra's Record | Columns, Speeches, Media Releases | Get the Facts | Join My Team | Contact Us | |||||||
| Make a Contribution | Buckland Park | Archives | Recent Mailers | Home |
Archives: Columns, Speeches and Press Releases From Past Campaigns
CIVIL LIBERTIES AND NATIONAL SECURITY:
BALANCING THE TWO IN A FREE SOCIETY
Last year I had the rare opportunity to hear Maya Anjelou, and recently poet Thom Ward presented his work at the Brighton Memorial Library’s Volunteer Awards Dinner. There is poetry in the words of these literary luminaries, and there is poetry in the Documents of our Founding Fathers and Mothers that laid the foundation of our freedom.
But there is no poetry in the USA Patriot Act, or in the proposed Domestic Security Enhancement Act (Patriot Act 2). Unless we are careful, these documents impose restrictions that may set us on a course of action that could ultimately undermine our American way of life.
Questioning or criticizing the USA Patriot Act may sound unpatriotic, based upon the very name of the legislation, but in fact it is an absolute act of patriotism to exercise one’s right of free speech to discuss the laws of our land. Already 110 communities in 25 states have passed resolutions in favor of protecting civil liberties relating to the USA Patriot Act.
What does this have to do with the library or with poets? Today, our rights of free expression and privacy are less free than they were before September 11, 2001. Perhaps this is necessary to a degree, but to what degree and for how long are the questions.
Recently, the federal government issued another Code Orange level security alert. As proud Americans, we must talk about the necessary sacrifices made in the interest of our own safety and our country’s security, and the essential balance we must strike to preserve and protect the freedoms we hold dear in our democracy. As we consider terrorist threats to our nation, we must also consider the unraveling of Constitutional protections and rights as no less of a threat to freedom’s future.
What safeguards do we have? Does the USA Patriot Act include “sunset” provisions? In fact it does provide an expiration date of December 31, 2005 for a number of surveillance provisions of the law. How has our country handled security and civil rights during historically challenging circumstances, and what were the results? What cautionary lessons did we learn from the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II and the McCarthy era? What relevance does this have to the relationship between the United States and Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, and the potential for peace in the region?
These and other questions must be at the forefront of policy discussions and decision making at national, state and local levels, demonstrating that our First Amendment rights, and our Founding Fathers’ vision as expressed in the Bill of Rights and U.S. Constitution, are not undone. The following questions should be considered when we think about certain provisions of the USA Patriot Act and the Domestic Security Enhancement Act (Patriot Act 2).
How far will we go – should we go – to ensure public safety and national security?
Within our own local municipal boundaries, we appropriately assign law enforcement officers to extra patrols at synagogues, mosques, and other sensitive locations as the need arises. We want the police to pursue suspicious people in the aftermath of a crime, and we work to prevent repeat violations. In the course of providing for local public safety and in cooperation with federal agencies on threats to national security, we have relied upon search warrants based upon adequate information as determined by a judge in a court of law, and the avoidance of racial profiling to conduct investigations.
The USA Patriot Act has lowered requirements and established new rules for federal, state and local law enforcement agencies during the current “War on Terrorism”. Will a Domestic Security Enhancement Act (Patriot Act 2) be approved? What standards should be preserved and what restrictions should be relaxed for law enforcement agencies charged with investigating and responding to terrorism in the shadow of the former World Trade Center? What about Guantanamo Bay? What role will the new federal Homeland Security Office have?
Are American values rooted in civil rights and pluralism in jeopardy?
The Bill of Rights and Constitution of the United States have created an extraordinary foundation for freedom and liberty. Legal weakening and political intimidation of First Amendment rights, use of racial profiling, lowering the bar for search and seizure, and indeterminate detention without legal representation threaten our democratic principles.
Since the enactment of the USA Patriot Act just 45 days after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the United States, people across America have both defended and criticized this new federal legislation.
Concerns about the erosion of constitutionally protected rights, infringement of privacy protections, and blurring the historic lines between law enforcement and security intelligence are among the issues raised in reaction to the rush to respond by a nation at risk of attack by terrorists.
The new Federal Department of Homeland Security is still in formation, yet intelligence has led to two Code Orange security alerts. As a result, local police agencies have had to divert resources from local crime fighting and law enforcement to homeland security/terrorist threat activity, without additional resources or funding from the Federal government.
Now, a possible Domestic Security Enhancement Act (Patriot Act 2) is under consideration by the U.S. Justice Department. The proposals would further relax certain civil rights protections in the asserted interest of safety and security.
President Harry S. Truman, upon creating the CIA to meet a need for
international intelligence, warned America to keep this new agency separate from
the FBI, which is charged with investigating domestic federal crimes. Why?
Because he feared that the CIA could become a “Gestapo-like” agency if it were
involved in domestic affairs.
Times have changed and we now have active terrorism within our borders. Does
that mean that the two should be consolidated within the Office of Homeland
Security, or should these agencies improve communication and collaboration
without merging?
Does the media openly and freely present all sides of the story? Is government information accessible? Are you aware that under the USA Patriot Act, gatekeepers of personal information—librarians, colleges and universities, and physicians—may be required to provide private information to the government for sensitive intelligence investigations, and cannot reveal that they have provided this information? What about the new lack of attorney-client privilege in federal cases?
How will the voice of the people be protected and heard? What will our democracy look like 10 or 20 years from now? What can you do?
We must not let the USA Patriot Act or its possible successor, though its very name, intimidate critical analysis and or free speech, even if it manipulates by suggesting that to do so in unpatriotic. Remember McCarthy—it took the courage of patriotic people to speak out against the scourge of slander in the face of threatened career ruination or worse, to end this domestic threat to our democratic way of life.
As we remember the ultimate sacrifices made by our sons and daughters, mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, friends, neighbors, and co-workers in defense of our precious freedoms liberties, we must also remember that we must be vigilant in defending our American way of life at home. We must speak out as patriots to preserve free speech, freedom of religion, and freedom from unwarranted search and seizure.
It is imperative that constant checks and balances remain intact and that Congress closely monitors the impact of these new laws.
Return to Sandy's statements
REMARKS OF LT. GOVERNOR CANDIDATE SANDRA FRANKEL
DEMOCRATIC RURAL CONFERENCE
March 23, 2002
Thank you Lori Gardner and Ben Barbash for those warm words of introduction and most of all, thank you DRC...
Like you I am an upstate Democrat.
Like you I have seen our region ignored by an out of touch Republican administration.
And like you I know what upstate has to offer to the Democratic Party.
So on behalf of all upstate Democrats I wholeheartily thank you.
Thank you for your hard work and determination which has not only changed the debate in our Democratic Party....
but also helped to elect to the United States Senate the two best friends upstate New York has ever had.
You have shone a bright light on the important issues that face upstate communities and families every day.
You said loud and clear that no longer can our political candidates ignore us.
And you have demonstrated time and again that Democrats win with upstate support.
...........
Four years ago I came before you seeking your support for Lt. Governor.
As you may remember, suffering from laryngitis, I had no voice.
But later in the Primary we came together with a loud and united voice.
A voice that said loud and clear that Democrats must have an upstater on our ticket.
So with your help I won 34 of the DRC's 41 counties, and 51% of the vote statewide in a three-way race.
I thank you all for that tremendous support.
And this year after the Primary, our voice must be even louder and more unified.
...........
Today upstate suffers. Suffers from the neglect and negligence of a Pataki administration that just doesn't get it.
George - our upstate communities are suffering, and you do nothing.
George - the upstate economy suffers, with few jobs, and falling farm prices, and you do nothing.
George - our schools suffer from your budget blunders, and still you do nothing.
George - you just don't get it....
We have all seen the effects of his failed administration in our upstate communities. Our economy lags way behind the state and nation.
And many of us have seen it on a much more personal level.
I am the proud mother of three wonderful children.
I am fortunate to have a son who has started a business in Poughkeepsie.
However, my other two children had to leave New York.
They found no opportunities in the upstate community they called home.
How many more young people will leave before George gets it.
...........
We must have a change in Albany.
Democrats are fortunate to have two excellent candidates for Governor.
Unlike George...
Andrew Cuomo gets it...
Carl McCall gets it...
For the economic survival of our communities, we need a Democratic Governor!
And, together, we can do it.
But to succeed in November we need the best team.
I provide the balance that either gubernatorial candidate needs to create that winning team.
A woman...
From upstate New York....
With political and elective experience.
I bring the elements that it takes for Democratic victory in November.
But this is not just about November.
This is about having the values, issues, and needs of upstate New York represented in the Governor's office every single day.
As Lt. Governor I will fight for upstate.
As your Lt. Governor, upstate New York will have a strong and passionate voice in Albany.
Fighting to bring the resources of the state, and our world class colleges and universities, together to fulfill our potential to create economic growth and opportunity.
Fighting to improve our schools and the broken funding formula.
And most of all, fighting for quality jobs with real living wages.
...........
Victory in November is in our grasp.
I for one will not rest until we succeed.
I will continue to crisscross this state from corner to corner...
From our smallest towns to our largest cities.
I will deliver the Democratic message to all the people of New York.
To farmers and stockbrokers.
Factory workers and financiers.
Men and women.
I promise you I will not rest until we succeed.
Because this race, and this party, are too important to ever let up.
Important to our communities...
Our families...
And our children.
For them, we must be... , we will be... , victorious in November.
Thank you.
PRESS RELEASE
FRANKEL SPEAKS OUT IN SUPPORT OF ISRAEL
April 8, 2002
Contact: Joshua Boisvert 585-271-6430
For immediate release.
Brighton, NY - Today, Democratic Lt. Governor candidate Sandra Frankel spoke out about the events unfolding in Israel and stood in solidarity with all New Yorkers whose families are in Israel.
“I like many other New Yorkers have a great personal stake in the current turmoil in Israel. My daughter, her husband, and my three grandchildren moved to Israel just over three weeks ago. Over the past days I have watched with alarm as events have unfolded there,” said Frankel.
“As New Yorkers we know what it is to live with the cowardly acts of terrorists, therefore we need to be the most vocal in our condemnation of terrorism regardless of terrorists’ public relations efforts. Furthermore, Israel is one of our staunchest allies and is the only democracy in the Middle East, so we must stand with her in this time of need. So, I call on the Bush administration to strongly support Israel in its war against terrorism,” said Frankel.
“Today, I stand with all New Yorkers whose loved ones are in Israel. I understand and share your fear and apprehension at this delicate time. You and your family are in my thoughts and prayers as we all hope and look forward to a peaceful resolution to this tragic time of violence,” said Frankel.
PRESS RELEASE
FRANKEL BLASTS PATAKI PRESIDENTIAL
PROSPECTING AS STATE BUDGET STALLED
April 12, 2002
Contact: Bob Cook 585-230-7646
For immediate release.
Manchester, NH - Sandra Frankel, New York Lt. Governor candidate and 1998 Democratic nominee, in a surprise press conference at the Holiday Inn in Manchester NH, today blasted Governor George Pataki’s "Presidential Prospecting" trip to New Hampshire as the NY state budget crisis remains unsolved.
"George it’s not ski season, why are you in New Hampshire?" asked Frankel.
"George we still don’t have a state budget!" said Frankel.
"The budget is almost two weeks late and instead of working for the people of New York, George Pataki plays with the political insiders of the first in the nation primary state," said Frankel.
"Pataki’s inaction is hurting our schools, our communities, and the hard working taxpayers of New York. With no budget in place our schools and communities cannot adequately plan their budgets for next year. Our schools can’t buy the books for our kids to read. Our towns can’t fix the roads that we all drive on. The taxpayers don’t know if their taxes will go up and if their state services will go down. Without the budget everything is on hold," said Frankel.
"But where is George… Is he in Albany with his sleeves rolled up getting to work? No, He’s in New Hampshire," said Frankel.
"Under George Pataki’s failed leadership we have no on-time state budget, we have a broken school system, and people are losing their jobs! But where is George?"
‘He’s here in New Hampshire and is clearly here for one reason and one reason alone, to promote his own ambitious Presidential or Vice Presidential aspirations. Before you try to lead the free world George why don’t you try to lead your own state," said Frankel.
"The people of New York deserve a full-time Governor, whose foremost priority is always the people of New York. The Democrats have two well-qualified candidates, in Carl McCall and Andrew Cuomo. George do us a favor, if you don’t want to be Governor just step aside and let one of these two exceptional candidates get to work," said Frankel.
Frankel made her statements outside the New Hampshire GOP Red, White and Blue annual fundraising Dinner. The dinner is the NH GOP’s major fundraising event and is a forum for any candidate actively seeking the 2008 Republican Presidential or 2004 Vice Presidential nomination.
PRESS RELEASE
STATEMENT OF DEMOCRATIC LT. GOVERNOR CANDIDATE
SANDRA FRANKEL ON THE LIBERAL PARTY VERSUS
WORKING FAMILIES PARTY DILEMMA
April 19, 2002
Contact: Larry Knox 585-576-7383
For immediate release.
As the 1998 nominee for Lt. Governor of both the Democratic and Working Families Parties, I am calling on my fellow 2002 candidates for Lt. Governor to join in the effort to put the Liberal Party out of business by repudiating the Liberal ballot line this year. Four years ago, the Liberals had no interest in working with our party to defeat George Pataki and since then they have continued to demonstrate that they no longer share our values – working against good Democrats in race after race, including most recently against our great new hard-working Senator Liz Krueger. Their only ideology is patronage.
The Working Families Party, on the other hand, for which I was one of the founding candidates, follows squarely in our progressive tradition. The WFP is a grassroots organization focused on providing a louder voice for the working women and men of New York. The party supports increasing the minimum wage, expanding and extending unemployment insurance benefits, making child care and health care more accessible and affordable, repairing crumbling schools and protecting TAP for college students.
New York is one of the few states that permits third party endorsements of major party candidates. The Republicans have used this to their advantage by developing an almost impenetrable relationship with the philosophically compatible Conservative and Right to Life parties. As Democrats, we need to build similar long-term relationships with those with whom we share common beliefs and with whom we can work in good faith. By partnering with the Working Families Party, we can earn victory for our state ticket this year and for Democrats and working families at all levels of government for many years to come.
I will not seek or accept the Liberal Party line. I ask my fellow Lt. Governor candidates to make this same vow.
PRESS RELEASE
SANDRA FRANKEL CORRECTS MISLEADING CHARLIE KING LETTER
SUPPORTS CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM
April 22, 2002
Contact: Joshua Boisvert 585-271-6430
For immediate release
Rochester, New York (4/22/02) - Lt. Governor Candidate Sandra Frankel today released the contents of a letter (attached) to fellow candidate Charlie King, which corrects the implication, contained in a letter that he released to the media, that she had signed a campaign pledge that he initiated.
Frankel reiterated her strong support for campaign finance reform, specifically her support for Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver’s bill on the subject, and encouraged her Democratic colleagues to work together on this issue. She noted that George Pataki resists reform efforts because he is a big beneficiary of the existing system. “He has simply refused to fight for what is needed to remove the taint of big money from New York campaigns,” she said.
She added, “It is way past time for New York to clean up its elections. This issue demands leadership. George Pataki and the Republicans won’t provide it. We – as Democrats united – must.
Attachment: Letter to Charlie King
April 22, 2002
Charlie King
c/o Charlie King 2002
P.O. Box 4017
Grand Central Station
New York, New York 10163-4017
Dear Charlie:
I read with surprise and disappointment your letter to Jane Hoffman, which is posted on politicsny.com. Your letter implies that I have signed a pledge that you initiated. As you well know, I have not done so. In fact, I will not sign your pledge because I believe that it is not a serious effort to win much-needed support for campaign finance reform, but rather a transparent attempt to criticize fellow Democrats. I do not believe that this is how the campaign for Lt. Governor ought to be waged. My campaign is focused on the failings of George Pataki, not on playing games of “gotcha” that seek to impugn our colleagues.
That is why, I have come out in strong support of real and substantial campaign finance reform. George Pataki has served for eight years and has done nothing to clean-up the financing of our campaign system. He has simply refused to fight for what is needed to remove the taint of big money from New York campaigns. In fact, he has raised campaign cash at unprecedented levels. He won’t fix the system, because he is the biggest beneficiary of it. As Democratic candidates, we need to work together to make sure that the voters get this message: George “Greenbacks” Pataki is no friend of clean campaigns.
There is a solution to the problem of big money in politics that we, as Democrats, should all be able to support. Assembly bill 8524A, sponsored by New York State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and most of the members of the Democratic conference, overwhelmingly passed the Assembly in 2001 and again on March 13, 2002. If you want to push pledges on our colleagues, here is one that makes sense and is not self-serving: agree to advocate, as I have, for the final enactment of this bill into law.
The Speaker’s campaign finance reform bill would change the face of elections in New York, forever, by instituting optional public financing of campaigns, with participating candidates required to comply with campaign expenditure limits; banning soft money donations to political parties’ housekeeping accounts; dramatically reducing the maximum amount that can be contributed to candidates and party committees; and permitting counties, cities and towns to seek authorization to impose similar regulations in their communities. In situations in which a participating candidate faced a wealthy or well-funded opponent who refused to opt into the public financing system, additional public funds would help to level the playing field for that candidate and the expenditure limits would be waived.
In total, this Democratic bill would ameliorate the impact of big money donors and big wealth which have combined to reduce the fairness and competitiveness of New York elections.
It is way past time for New York to clean up its elections. This issue demands leadership. George Pataki and the Republicans won’t provide it. We – as Democrats united - must.
Sincerely,Sandra Frankel
PRESS RELEASE
FRANKEL ASSAILS PATAKI'S RECORD ON EDUCATION
CALLS ON GOVERNOR TO CEASE GRACE LAWSUIT APPEAL
April 26, 2002
Contact: Larry Knox 585 576 7383
For immediate release.
(New York, NY April 26, 2002) Today, at the New York State United Teachers annual convention, Democratic Lt. Governor candidate Sandra Frankel released a statement assailing Governor George Pataki for his failed leadership on education and called on him stop the state’s appeal of the Grace lawsuit.
“George Pataki receives a failing grade when it comes to education.”
“The teachers here today see the results of George Pataki’s failed leadership. They see that George Pataki stands in the way of properly funding our schools. They see that George Pataki perpetuates a broken school funding system that has more to do with politics than teaching our kids. They see that George Pataki’s idea of education funding is to give millions to an out of state law firm to fight a court ruling that would restore funding equity for our schools. So, today I call on Governor Pataki to immediately stop the state’s appeal of the Grace lawsuit,” said Frankel.
“George Pataki has failed our schools, he has failed our teachers, and he has failed our children. And it is time we do something about it. We need to get together, support a Democrat for Governor, and send Pataki packing,” said Frankel.
Sandra Frankel is a Democratic candidate for Lt. Governor. She was the 1998 Democratic and Working Families Parties Lt. Governor Nominee. Frankel released her statement at the NYSUT annual convention in New York City. Ms. Frankel also participated in a NYSUT and United Federation of Teachers march and protest against stalled New York City teacher contract negotiations where teachers have gone without a contract for over 17 months. Ms. Frankel is Brighton Town Supervisor and former President of the Monroe County School Boards Association.
PRESS RELEASE
ROCHESTER AFRICAN AMERICAN LEADERS ENDORSE
SANDRA FRANKEL FOR LT. GOVERNOR
"BY FAR THE MOST QUALIFIED OF ALL THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES"
"THE BEST BALANCE FOR THE DEMOCRATIC TICKET IN NOVEMBER"
April 27, 2002
Contact: Joshua Boisvert 585-271-6430
For immediate release
(Rochester, NY April 27, 2002) Today, in a show of unity in the African American political community, a broad coalition of African American leaders formally endorsed Sandra Frankel for Lt. Governor. The news conference was held at the Monroe County Democratic Committee headquarters and was hosted by Assemblyman David Gantt.
"I am proud to stand here today with this impressive group of Rochester area African American leaders to formally endorse our friend and the next Lt. Governor for the State of New York, Sandy Frankel," said Assemblyman Gantt. Gantt explained that, as a fixture in local government Frankel is well known to them and her record of accomplishment is clear. "We know the integrity and tenacity that Sandy brings to this race because it is the same effort that she brings to any endeavor that she attempts. Sandy is by far the most qualified of all the Democratic candidates for Lt. Governor with proven electability and executive experience. Sandy has been a real leader in the Rochester area and now it is time to put her knowledge and expertise to work for all the people of New York," said Assemblyman Gantt.
Gantt went on to criticize the failings of the Pataki administration, "under the neglect of the Pataki administration our economy has suffered, particularly in our upstate urban areas. We are losing jobs and our children are leaving New York because they see no future here, but Pataki says everything is fine upstate." Gantt condemned Pataki for his failings on education including school funding and his pursuit of the multi-million dollar court challenge to the Grace lawsuit. "Under the neglect of the Pataki administration education has suffered, the economy has suffered, and the people have suffered and it is time for change," said Assemblyman Gantt.
City Councilman Wade Norwood explained why Frankel was the best political choice for Lt. Governor. "Sandy Frankel is the most qualified Lt. Governor candidate and is the best balance for the Democratic ticket in November," said Norwood. Norwood explained that in addition to Sandy's excellent qualifications for the job she also brings to the ticket demographic and geographic assets as well. "When our ticket reflects the strength and diversity of New York, Democrats are successful; having one of our neighbors, a Jewish woman from Upstate on the ticket will absolutely help us take back the Governor's office in November," said Norwood.
After warmly thanking everyone, Frankel spoke about the importance of this election. "This election is too important not to succeed." Frankel related how two of her children left New York because they could not find economic opportunities here. Frankel then lambasted the Pataki administration for its recent comments concerning the strength of the Upstate economy. "Just the other day, George Pataki was touting a Wall Street analysis that said everything is just fine upstate. Well George, tell that to the laid off factory worker, who now works at a low wage service job and doesn't know how he's going to put food on his family's table or where she's going to find the extra cash, just to pay the bills. George Pataki, just doesn't get it, he doesn't understand that New York families deserve living wages, not low wages. But with your help, we'll make a difference for New York families by sending Pataki packing in November," said Sandra Frankel.
The following list of individuals also attended the press conference or joined in the endorsement of Sandra Frankel:
Rochester Mayor Bill Johnson, City Councilman Benjamin Douglas, City Councilman Tony Thompson, City School Board Member Darryl Porter, City School Board Member Shirley Thompson, County Legislator Ron Thomas, County Legislator Calvin Lee, 27th Legislative District Democratic Leader Adam McFadden, Past President Monroe County Young Democrats Lawrence Knox, Jr.
PRESS RELEASE
Lt. Governor Candidate Sandra Frankel Endorses
Carl McCall for Governor
May 11, 2002
Contact: Joshua Boisvert 585-271-6430
For immediate release
(Rochester, NY May 11, 2002) Democratic Lt. Governor candidate Sandra Frankel today endorsed Carl McCall in his bid for the New York Democratic Gubernatorial nomination.
Speaking in front of a crowd of Frankel and McCall supporters, Ms. Frankel explained that her endorsement of McCall is based on his record of accomplishment in the public and private sector and his vast experience in New York government. “Carl McCall knows how New York government works and he understands the people of New York. He is the candidate best prepared to confront the economic and education challenges that face our state,” said Frankel.
“Carl McCall clearly has the best chance of defeating George Pataki. Carl has broad political appeal across racial, socio-economic, and even party lines. Carl McCall is the Democrat that can create the winning coalition to send Pataki packing,” added Frankel.
Frankel also told the crowd that she would be proud to be part of a McCall Frankel ticket. “As an upstate Jewish woman, with experience as an elected executive, I provide the best balance for the Democratic ticket. New York is a diverse state, and our party is a diverse party, our ticket must reflect that diversity. It is particularly important for Democrats to have a woman on the statewide ballot this year, since the Republicans will have one and perhaps two women on their ticket. And, I am well positioned to help energize other constituencies that our party needs to be victorious,” said Frankel.
“I look forward to a strong victory in the Primary and to running an aggressive general election campaign with Carl McCall in the fall,” concluded Frankel.
Frankel spoke outside the Monroe County Democratic Committee Headquarters. Frankel is the Supervisor of the Town of Brighton, an inner-ring suburb of Rochester, as well as the Democrat Party's 1998 Lt. Governor nominee. Ms. Frankel is the only woman running for the 2002 Democratic nomination for Lt. Governor.
PRESS RELEASE
Lt. Governor Candidate Sandra Frankel Endorsed
by Rochester Elected Officials, Party Leaders
May 15, 2002
Contact: Joshua Boisvert 585-271-6430
For immediate release
Rochester, NY May 14, 2002- Today in an overwhelming show of support Lt. Governor Candidate Sandra Frankel announced her endorsement by a broad-based group of Rochester area elected officials and Democratic Party leaders, including Congresswoman Louise Slaughter, Mayor Bill Johnson and Monroe County Democratic Chair Ted O’Brien.
“People who know you best are the best judge’s of your character, and the people, party leaders, and elected officials in Monroe County are solidly behind Sandy Frankel for Lt. Governor. They know Sandy’s strength as a leader, as a community activist, and as a person; they know that Sandy Frankel is the most qualified Democrat for Lt. Governor. Sandy is also a proven statewide candidate, winning 55 of the State’s 62 counties in 1998. The list of local supporters for Sandra Frankel speaks volumes about her quality as a candidate and as a leader,” said Monroe County Democratic Chair, Ted O’Brien.
Congresswoman Louise Slaughter stated, “Sandy Frankel has been a tireless fighter for the people in our community. Whether fighting for quality jobs, a cleaner environment, or for an excellent education for our children, Sandy has never wavered in her commitment or leadership. Sandy will bring this same dedication and determination to work for all the people of New York State as Lt. Governor.”
Rochester Mayor William Johnson added, “Sandy Frankel understands the important economic and educational issues facing our cities. Sandy brings the crucial skills and experience needed to tackle the tough issues facing New York.”
State Senator Richard Dollinger said, “Sandy Frankel is the kind of leader we need in Albany.”
State Assemblywoman Susan John noted, “not only is Sandy Frankel exceptionally qualified to be Lt. Governor, she is also the Democrats’ only chance to place a woman on the statewide ballot. It is essential for women to be represented on the Democratic ballot.”
The following is a list of Sandra Frankel’s Rochester area endorsements:
United States Congresswoman Louise Slaughter
Rochester Mayor William Johnson
Democratic State Legislators:
State Senator Richard Dollinger
State Assemblyman David Gantt
State Assemblywoman Susan John
State Assemblyman David Koon
State Assemblyman Joe Morelle
Entire Democratic Caucus of Monroe County Legislators:
Monroe County Legislator Stephanie Aldersley
Monroe County Legislator Fred Amato
Monroe County Legislator Bill Benet
Monroe County Legislator H. Todd Bullard
Monroe County Legislator Jose Cruz
Monroe County Legislator Lynda Garner Goldstein
Monroe County Legislator Calvin Lee
Monroe County Legislator Kevin Murray
Monroe County Legislator Carla Palumbo
Monroe County Legislator Jay Ricci
Monroe County Legislator C. Mitchell Rowe
Monroe County Legislator Ron Thomas
Monroe County Legislator Christopher Wilmot
Entire Rochester City Council
City Council President Lois Giess
City Council Vice-President Gladys Santiago
City Council Member Brian Curran
City Council Member Ben Douglas
City Council Member Nancy Griswold
City Council Member Tim Mains
City Council Member Wade Norwood
City Council Member Bob Stevenson
City Council Member Tony Thompson
Rochester City School Board
James Bowers
Robert Brown
President Joanne Giuffrida
Darryl Porter
Shirley Thompson
Bolgen Vargus
Brighton Town Officials
Councilperson Sherry Kraus
Councilperson Raymond Tierney
Councilperson Jill Vigdor-Feldman
Councilperson James Vogel
Town Clerk Susan Kramarsky
Chili Town Officials
Councilperson James Powers
New York State Democratic Committee Members
Colleen Anderson
Sheila Fleischauer
David Gantt
Owen Ireland
Patrick Malgieri
Pedro Maneiro
John Noble
Ronald Pettengill
Wanda Richardson
Teresa Robach
Patsy Robertson
Mark Siwiec
Democratic Party Leaders
Robert Cook, Vice Chair, NY Democratic State Committee
Larry Knox, Vice President, Monroe County Young Democrats
Saul Maneiro, President, Monroe County Young Democrats
Edward O’Brien, Chair, Monroe County Democratic Committee
M. Betsy Relin, Member, Democratic National Committee
PRESS RELEASE
New York State NOW Endorses Frankel for Lt. Governor
Women Need A Place on Democratic Ticket!
May 16, 2002
Contact: Joshua Boisvert (Frankel Campaign) 585-271-6430
Kathryn Lake Mazierski (NYS NOW) 716-285-5598
For immediate release
Niagara Falls NY, May 16, 2002- The National Organization for Women – New York State Political Action Committee today announced its endorsement of Democrat Sandra Frankel for Lt. Governor.
“Sandra Frankel is a strong voice for women and families. As an elected executive, a school board member, and an educator Sandra has always fought for the values and issues important to women. Sandy’s qualifications are unmatched by any other candidate for Lt. Governor- She has direct and practical experience with how government can best serve the people of New York, and she has an outstanding record of accomplishment. The NOW-NYS PAC is proud to formally endorse Sandra Frankel for Lt. Governor,” said NOW-NYS President Kathryn Lake Mazierski.
Mazierski went on to explain the political importance of supporting Frankel. “There must be an experienced, eminently well-qualified woman on the Democratic ticket. Democrats must not fail to emulate their ideals, by failing to put together the best-balanced ticket possible. In addition to Sandy being the only Democratic woman running for statewide office, she also has proven experience. Failure to have her on the ticket would cause a serious blow to the party’s chances of defeating George Pataki in November.”
“Sandra Frankel has demonstrated that she has what it takes to help lead our State and to carry Democrats to victory in November,” concluded Mazierski.
“I am honored by the endorsement of NOW-NYS. I proudly stand with NOW in their continuing fight for the rights of women and families, and look forward to their help in energizing voters across the State in support of the Democratic Gubernatorial ticket,” said Frankel
Sandra Frankel has received support throughout New York leading up to next week’s New York State Democratic Committee Convention. Ms. Frankel won the 1998 Democratic Primary with 55 of New York’s 62 counties, including all five New York City boroughs. Ms. Frankel is the only Democratic woman running for Lt. Governor.
Greater Rochester Association of Women Attorneys
March 22, 1995 Luncheon
Good afternoon. I want to thank all the members of the Greater Rochester Association of Women Attorneys for sponsoring this discussion of Women in Public Service. It is not only appropriate in view of the fact that March is Women's History Month, but also considering the spirit of our times and the changes that have occurred with women in government.
Over the years, this area has been unique in its variety of women representatives from all levels of government and political affiliations. Representatives such as Louise Slaughter, Joanne Van Zandt, Nan Johnson, Pinny Cooke, Irene Gossing, Susan John, Mary Ellen Jones, Lois Geiss, Margaret Freeman and the individuals attending our discussion today have all shaped public policy for this region.
This array of officials have run for different positions, on different issues. But one thing is true -- as women they faced and broke similar barriers and brought something new to a male-dominated governance, that until the efforts of women such as Susan B. Anthony, sought to confine women to predetermined roles and stereotypes.
Indeed, these women prove that "failure is impossible." I would venture to say uniformly, our interest serving in government came more from a sense of advocacy than it did for interest in a career in politics. After all, as women we are natural advocates and nurturers. In many ways, that is how I became interested in Public Service. My more than 20 years in the public and private sector as a speech pathologist, and at home raising three children was flavored by my life-long public consciousness.
Initially, I needed not to look past some of the basic life issues surrounding the upbringing of my family, such as education. With a parent's concern and an activist's enthusiasm, I took an active role in ensuring that the educational system maximized potential, and fostered opportunity and diversity for my kids -- the community's kids.
After ten years of involvement in education in Brighton, the Monroe County School Boards Association, and BOCES, I became familiar with the workings of local, state and federal government. Education is a melting pot of issues faced on a larger scale by all levels of government. With that perspective, I became increasingly interested in the issues that imperiled the quality of life in our community of Brighton.
So, in 1989, I chose to run for Town Supervisor. I was defeated, but as they say, "not beaten." I ran again in 1991 and was elected. Upon taking office, I realized that I had to be different not just from my male predecessors, but from the "politics as usual" mentality that drives decisions.
Since that time, my goal has been to deliver government that is open, professional, and accomplishes its goals. For me this experience has been tremendously rewarding. As an Executive of Local Government, I have been able to make my community a better place to live, work and raise a family.
As a woman, there is a tremendous amount of circumspection on your ability to govern. To be blunt, a man can rely on his credentials. I am sure many of the women here today will agree, we are constantly proving ourselves. In many ways that bias has created a different sense of excellence.
My time in government has been an exciting opportunity for personal and professional growth. As Supervisor of a Town with almost 35,000 residents, I manage a municipal operation with a budget over $12 million and more than 200 employees.
Local government has provided me with exposure to a myriad of issues and concerns. The issues reflect the character and influence of the citizens of Brighton. Our effort to fight crime, preserve open space for park land, improve our infrastructure, deliver quality community services, balance the interests of preservation and development, properly manage finances, provide outlets for families, and protect our neighborhoods are guided by the involvement of these citizens.
Opportunities are diverse and plentiful for women in government. There are a variety of ways you can get involved: citizen participation in one of our many community events such as the children's Bike Rodeo, annual Arts Fest, and 4th of July Celebration; utilizing your professional or personal experiences on one of the town's six citizen advisory boards; participating in one of the town's task forces on issues such as communications, violence prevention, and economic development; run for elected town office or serve as legal counsel to a local government.
Whatever role you choose, your involvement in local government is not just a good opportunity to develop your skills and serve your community, it is also a necessary compliment to ensure that government continues to avail itself of fresh, talented people interested in making a difference in their fellow citizens' lives.
NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE EXECUTIVE BUDGET FY 1995-96
Testimony Presented March 27, 1995
Good afternoon. As an Executive of a local municipality, I know first hand the role that government plays in the "quality of life" of a community. A review of Governor Pataki's 1995 Executive Budget raises serious concerns about the impact of the plan on local governments and the community as a whole. Government at all levels has a responsibility to make decisions not just for the short term, but more importantly, for the long term.
Issues such as taxes, crime, economic development, education, and health care require responsible public investments to ensure a secure and viable future for our communities, for our citizens, and for our children.
Analysis of the 1994 elections shows clearly that people wanted a change. The rhetoric of campaigns does not translate readily into responsible governance. Unfortunately, in New York State, we are witnessing an Executive who is leading as a candidate rather than as Governor.
Despite campaign pledges to reform the New York State Budget Process, we are witnessing business as usual.
Lack of an open process: negotiating in the dark.
A lack of details on the range and impact of cuts and agency restructuring.
Fiscal gimmickry -- sale of NYS Facilities.
Late Budget.
Albany must be accountable. The Legislature and the Governor need to change the way New York operates. The would do well to follow the model of local governments in New York State. Local governments across the state must deliberate their annual budgets in an open process, including public hearings. Local governments must approve their annual budgets timely by November 20th. Local governments must produce precise, detailed budgets and disclose impacts on operations and services. Local governments undergo the annual scrutiny of independent auditors and review by the NYS Comptroller's Office every three years.
The Pataki Budget holds several concerns for local governments.
PROPERTY TAXES: The Governor's proosed four-year personal income tax cut may shift the burden to the local property tax. As an Executive of a local municipality, I have reduced the size of government, streamlined operations with the use of technology, and engaged in cooperative agreements with other governments to cut costs, all the while providing the community with essential services. This proposed State Budget is akin to the short-sighted policies of Ronald Reagen's "New Federalism". This translates to the lay person as a fancy feel-good shell-game that benefits the few and passes the burden on to the localities.
What we really need to be talking about are property taxes -- not an income tax plan that has 5% of the wealthiest receiving close to half the benefits. Let's help local governments. They are the last bastion of government that is closest and most accountable to the people.
One need only look to New Jersey to see the detrimental impact that local governments and property taxpayers have undergone with an income tax plan similar to Governor Pataki's.
CRIME: The Governor's proposal to eliminate the Aid to Law Enforcement Program and the Aid to Crime Laboratories are good examples of the attack that this budget will have upon local government. Cooperative efforts to prevent and fight crime, and to eliminate the spread of drugs and weapons, must not be reduced.
TRANSPORTATION: Reduction in the Consolidated Highway Improvement Program (CHIPS) will force the Town of Brighton to reconsider its priorities on repairing and enhancing our infrastructure of highways, bridges, and railroad crossings.
EDUCATION: Lately, it has become politically popular to attack our education system. We need to remind ourselves that this is where we invest directly into our children's future. If New York State's funding does not match the burgeoning enrollments that many local school districts are facing, it is a reduction in support. We must invest in our education system. Yes, repair and realign what has not been productive -- but do not attack a system that provides the base for our community's future. The current Pataki school-aid is below what the law would provide. That is unacceptable.
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES: Eliminating Medicaid or enforcing draconian reductions is not the panacea for state or local government. The Pataki plan to reduce Medicaid will have disastrous impact upon senior citizens and children. Elimination of the state's Long-Term Care Program sends a message to Senior Citizens and the middle class that they do not matter. Cutback's in Day Care counteract our intent to get people back in the workforce and increase the reality that more children will receive poor care or none at all.
The reduction of the programs has an impact beyond the confines of any municipal boundary. It shatters decency and makes the lives of seniors and families-in-need more burdensome.
ENVIRONMENT: Reducing our state's environmental standards is not a legacy that anyone should inherit. Sadly, the cuts proposed in environmental protection by the Pataki Administration hold the possibility of endangering our communities. No one likes regulations that impact their activity. The goal should be to create a system of environmental protection that is less of a police agency, and more of a problem solver. But, we cannot tolerate blind cuts that will reduce an agency's ability to protect communities form harmful environmental activity. Raiding the Environmental Protection Fund, weakening the DEC's environmental enforcement, and hazardous waste investigation is dangerous.
LONG-TERM CONCERNS: What we really need to talk about is long term planning. If rhetoric matches responsiblity, then State Government should not be engaging in activity that has a high likelihood of passing a burden -- better yet a mandate -- on to local governments and the local property tax.
Local government needs more of a partnership with New York State -- not to serve as the balance points for poor long term planning. State and local taxpayers are one-in-the-same, and our efforts should be focused on delivering government that is more affordable on both fronts, not exclusively.
STATE OF THE TOWN ADDRESS
January 22, 2003
Sandra L. Frankel
Brighton Town SupervisorA decade has passed since my administration opened the doors of Town Hall and ushered in an era of open and responsive government. We’ve made tough financial decisions that have had long-lasting, positive benefits and we’ve sacrificed and planned for the future, with a vision of a better tomorrow. Through active citizen participation we’ve worked together to identify shared community goals and we’ve implemented policies and programs that have made Brighton the best town in which to live, work and raise a family.
As we look back just one year ago, our country and community were still reeling from the terrorist attacks of September 11th. We stood united and strong as we reaffirmed our commitment to preserve and protect our country and the freedoms we enjoy right here at home. We reflected upon the beautiful mosaic that is America, and reinforced our respect for fellow citizens regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, or age. Brighton is enriched by its diversity, and we continue to strive to live, work and play together in harmony and with respect for one another.
In 2003, we will continue to prepare for our community’s safety and security. On the eve of the New Year, we implemented enhanced fire protection services for the people who live and work in West Brighton, and within days, this inter-municipal contract with the city of Rochester proved invaluable in fighting a structure fire at Rustic Village Apartments. Thank you Jim Vogel, Pat Inzer, Ken Rohr, and the members of the task force for your hard work and excellent results.
We are also working towards establishing enhanced emergency medical response services in West Brighton, and plan to implement changes in 2003. These supplemental services will reinforce the fine work of the West Brighton Fire Department and Brighton Volunteer Ambulance, which, like many other agencies across the nation, have experienced increased difficulty in recruiting and retaining volunteers. In order to reverse the decline in volunteerism for these critical public safety services, and to control future costs and higher taxes, this year I will be proposing a plan that to provide an incentive to increase the ranks of emergency response volunteers.
We will continue to meet the growing public safety needs of our residents and business owners by providing the necessary funds for this community’s top-notch, re-accredited police force, led by Chief Tom Voelkl, and will continue to work collaboratively as a member of the Multi-Agency Drug Task Force.
In the coming weeks, I will be announcing a new policy for Town of Brighton employees that will ensure “crime victims” the right to paid leave from work to attend court proceedings related to the crime.
In 2002, with a plan in place, we trained for a coordinated public safety response to potential disaster incidents, utilizing the facilities and services of the Monroe County Office of Emergency Preparedness. We brought together town elected officials, key department heads, and representatives from police, fire, and ambulance services, for classroom instruction and a tabletop drill.
And we prepared for a peaceful and productive future for our town.
Overall, the accomplishments of the year 2002 improved the quality of life in the Town of Brighton, and built an even stronger foundation for our children and grandchildren’s future.
With the approval of the 2002 Open Space and Development Plan effectively securing a large portion of this community’s few remaining acres of precious open space, and our continued efforts to deliver essential town programs and services within reasonable financial means, I am happy to say that the State of the Town of Brighton has never been better.
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, the culmination of nearly a decade of planning by the Town and residents came to fruition as Brighton voters gave overwhelming support to the 2002 Open Space Acquisition and Development Plan. This truly historic plan reflects our administration’s commitment to create a town-wide park system and closely follows the community’s shared goals and objectives for land use decisions, as set forth in Comprehensive Plan 2000.
The plan will provide up to $8,022,725 for the acquisition of open space and the preserv
